Data Quality

Analytics Data Quality Checklist

Run a repeatable review of events, consent, cross-domain journeys, campaign tags, and revenue.

What this metric or method tells you

Reliable analysis starts with implementation checks. A clean dashboard cannot compensate for duplicate tags, missing consent states, broken referral handling, or events firing at the wrong moment.

The useful question is not whether a number moved in isolation. Ask which audience, page, campaign, device, and time period produced the change. Keep the definition and reporting scope visible so another person can reproduce the comparison.

A practical analysis workflow

  1. Write the decision first. State what you will change if the evidence points in one direction or another.
  2. Check the collection. Confirm the event, date range, filters, consent behavior, and comparison period before interpreting the chart.
  3. Segment carefully. Break the result down only where the segment has enough volume and a plausible reason to behave differently.
  4. Look for supporting evidence. Pair the headline metric with volume, quality, and downstream outcomes.
  5. Record the next step. Document the finding, limitation, owner, and date for a follow-up check.

Actions worth taking

  • Compare analytics totals with source systems.
  • Test critical events after every release.
  • Keep an event dictionary with owners.

Start with the smallest change that can test the explanation. Preserve the earlier report or annotation so you can distinguish the effect of the change from seasonality and ordinary variation.

Common interpretation mistakes

  • Assuming a tag is correct because it fires.
  • Collecting more parameters than the team uses.

A dashboard cannot remove uncertainty. Use these measures as evidence, state the limits, and avoid presenting estimated or attributed values as exact counts of individual people.

Review checklist

  • The metric definition and denominator are written beside the result.
  • The date range and comparison period represent similar business conditions.
  • Internal, test, and known automated traffic are handled consistently.
  • No personal or sensitive information appears in URLs, event names, or parameters.
  • The conclusion leads to a specific decision or a clearly defined follow-up question.